(1) Dario Costantino Spallone (2) Mattia Bodini v Alessandro Pedersoli [2019] DIFC CFI 091 (30 March 2020)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Dubai International Financial Centre


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Dubai International Financial Centre >> (1) Dario Costantino Spallone (2) Mattia Bodini v Alessandro Pedersoli [2019] DIFC CFI 091 (30 March 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/cfi_091.html
Cite as: [2019] DIFC CFI 091, [2019] DIFC CFI 91

[New search] [Help]


(1) Dario Costantino Spallone (2) Mattia Bodini v Alessandro Pedersoli [2019] DIFC CFI 091

March 30, 2020 Court of First Instance -Judgments

Claim No. CFI 091/2019

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

Court

IN THE COURT

Court
OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

(1) DARIO COSTANTINO SPALLONE

(2) MATTIA BODINI

Claimants

and

ALESSANDRO PEDERSOLI

Defendant

Defendant


DEFAULT JUDGMENT MADE BY JUDICIAL OFFICER NASSIR AL NASSER


UPONthe request made by the Claimants on 24 March 2020 for a Default Judgment in accordance with Rule 13.1 (1) and (2) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts

DIFC Courts
(“RDC”) (the ”Request”), it is found as follows:

1. The Request is not one prohibited by RDC 13.3 (1) or (2).

2. The Defendant has failed to file an Acknowledgment of Service

Service
or a Defence to the claim (or any part of the claim) with the DIFC
DIFC
Courts and the relevant time for doing so has expired (RDC 13.4).

3. The Claimant

Claimant
filed a Certificate of Service pursuant to RDC 9.43 on 27 February 2020.

4. The Claimant has followed the required procedure for obtaining Default Judgment (RDC 13.7 and 13.8).

5. The DIFC Courts are satisfied that the conditions of RDC 13.22 and RDC 13.23 [Defendant served outside jurisdiction] have been met.

6. The Claimant has submitted evidence, as required by RDC 13.24, that: (i) the claim is one that the DIFC Courts have power to hear and decide; (ii) no other court has exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide the claim; and (iii) the claim has been properly served (RDC 13.22 and 13.23).

ACCORDINGLY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

7. The Request is granted.

8. The Defendant is ordered to transfer his shares in, Luminal Agency FZ-LLC, to the Claimant. The Claimant shall pay the Defendant AED 22,000, being a nominal amount for the transfer of shares.

9. The Defendant shall pay the Claimants the costs of the claim, to be assessed by the Registrar

Registrar
, if not agreed.

10. The Claimants shall serve this order on the Defendant.

Issued by:

Nour Hineidi

Deputy Registrar

Deputy Registrar

Date of Issue: 29 March 2020

At: 4pm


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2020/cfi_091.html