Watson Farley & Williams (Middle East) LLP v Union Properties PJSC [2023] DIFC CFI 071 (27 January 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

Thank you very much for your support!


BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

The Dubai International Financial Centre


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> The Dubai International Financial Centre >> Watson Farley & Williams (Middle East) LLP v Union Properties PJSC [2023] DIFC CFI 071 (27 January 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2023/DCFI_071.html
Cite as: [2023] DIFC CFI 71, [2023] DIFC CFI 071

[New search] [Help]


CFI 071/2022 Watson Farley & Williams (Middle East) LLP v Union Properties PJSC

January 27, 2023 COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE - ORDERS

Claim No: CFI 071/2022

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS (MIDDLE EAST) LLP

Claimant

and

UNION PROPERTIES PJSC

Defendant


DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF JUDICIAL OFFICER MAITHA ALSHEHHI


UPON the request made by the Claimant on 26 January 2023 (the “Request”) for a Default Judgment in accordance with Rule 13.1(1) and (2) of the Rules of the DIFC Courts (“RDC”) against the Defendant, and the accompanying witness statement of Ms. Charlotte Bijlani dated 26 January 2023, it is found as follows:

1. The Request is not one prohibited by RDC 13.3.

2. The Request is one permitted by RDC 13.4 on the basis that the Defendant has failed to file an Acknowledgment of Service or a Defence to the claim (or any part of the claim) with the DIFC Courts and the relevant time for so doing has expired.

3. The Defendant has not: (i) applied to the DIFC Courts to have the Claimant’s statement of case struck out under RDC 4.16; or for immediate judgment under RDC Part 24 (RDC 13.6(1)); (ii) satisfied the whole claim (including any claim for costs) on which the Claimant is seeking judgment; or (iii) filed or served on the Claimant an admission under RDC 15.14 or 15.24 together with a request for time to pay in accordance with RDC 13.6(3).

4. The Claimant filed a Certificate of Service in accordance with RDC 9.43 on 25 October 2022.

5. The Claimant has followed the required procedure for obtaining Default Judgment in accordance with RDC 13.7 and 13.8.

6. The claim is for a specified sum of money and the Request specifies the date by which the whole of the judgment debt is to be paid or the times and rate at which it is to be paid by instalments in accordance with RDC 13.9.

7. The Request includes a request for interest pursuant to RDC 13.14 and the claim form sets out the calculation of interest in the claim.

8. The DIFC Courts are satisfied that the conditions as set out in RDC 13.22 have been met.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Request is granted.

2. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant, within 14 days of issuance of this Order, the amount of USD 76,305.78 plus statutory interest at the rate of 9%, in the amount of USD 18.82 per day of delay and legal costs, in the amount of USD 20,067.8.

3. The Claimant shall serve this Order upon the Defendant.

Issued by:
Delvin Sumo
Assistant Registrar
Date of issue: 27 January 2023
At:10am


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ae/cases/DIFC/2023/DCFI_071.html